If it wanted to instil Hindu pride, it needed actors with more dignified conviction, and a production and musical palette with more orchestral swells, more rapture. Contrasting Samrat Prithviraj to The Kashmir Files, which in one vitriolic swoop could become one of the most profitable Hindi films of all time, the tweet said: “Misery of Hindus sells better than the Glory of Hindus.”īut I believe this makes little sense in the face of the most glaring fact-that Samrat Prithviraj is an ineffective historical film. They noted that Akshay Kumar’s star seemed on a steady wane.īut one Twitter account, Veer Sorry Worker, had a more sobering conclusion. Others linked the failure to previous Akshay Kumar flops- Bell Bottom and Bachchhan Pandey, the latter a remake of Jigarthanda, which had successfully revived the Cine Madurai genre of gore. Some liken its failure to the Kangana Ranaut starring action spectacle Dhaakad, noting that neither social media stardom nor bootlicking the regime necessarily works at the box office. The theorists are tweeting, for there is no pleasure greater than that of spinning observations into trends, stringy data into solid conclusions. The Akshay Kumar-starrer Samrat Prithviraj, directed by Dr Chandraprakash Dwivedi, has flopped at the box office.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |